This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Fri Jan 19 12:12:05 CET 2018
> On 19 Jan 2018, at 11:08, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > > In my opinion there are 3 points to clarify: ... irrelevant points snipped ... PLEASE put those comments in a different thread which makes it clear you're discussing detail about 2016-4 (or whatever). Thanks. This thread's supposed to be about an entirely different topic.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]