[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 To Last Call (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 06:58:37PM +0100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg wrote:
> Understood, even do, I will love to heard that from the NCC, because the disadvantage is that then to interpret the policy text, you need to read ???all??? the policy proposals, which I don???t think is very nice or useful.
> 
> Despite that, I still believe that my proposed text (or something a bit lighter, in the middle) is not changing the proposal goal, so not changing the consensus ???status???, neither doing the ???micro-management??? that you mention, so it is acceptable as last call changes, of course if Max agree.

No text changes (except fixing typos) happen in last call.  If we change
text, it goes back to a new IA and a new review phase.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20180118/bdbeab82/attachment.sig>