[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 To Last Call (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)

> On 15 Jan 2018, at 12:49, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> wrote:
> 
>  I think the PDP has not been followed correctly.

In that case Jordi, you can use the PDP to raise those concerns. Though I think you're actually complaining about Gerd's consensus declaration on 2016-04 rather than whether the PDP has been followed or not.

I quote from Section 3.2 of the PDP:

Anyone who believes that the proposal has not been handled correctly or that the WG chair has made an incorrect determination of consensus should first raise the matter with the WG chair. If the dispute cannot be resolved with the WG chair, the Appeals Procedure can be invoked.

And from Section 4:

4. Appeals Procedure

If a grievance cannot be resolved with the chair of the WG the matter can be brought to the attention of the Working Group Chairs Collective (WGCC). Anyone may submit an appeal. This must be submitted to the relevant WG mailing list(s) and to the Policy Announce Mailing List (policy-announce at ripe.net). The appeal will also be published by the RIPE NCC at appropriate locations on the RIPE web site. Any appeal should include a detailed and specific description of the issues and clearly explain why the appeal was submitted. An appeal must be submitted no later than four weeks after the appealable action has occurred.


AFAICT it's you who isn't following the PDP. :-) You don't seem to have discussed your objections to the consensus determination with the WG co-chairs or indicated that those discussions failed to resolve your complaint. No matter. If we've passed that point, you can still appeal to the WGCC. But that requires a detailed and specific description of the issues and an explanation of why the appeal was necessary. That hasn't happened. At least not yet.