This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 To Last Call (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Last Call for Comments (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Mon Jan 15 13:38:35 CET 2018
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:21 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > This basically means that I can also do the same every month when I speak in about IPv6 in a conference, for any subsequent proposal that I submit, and get hundreds of “support voices” even if there is objection (for example to remove PI), If mentioning your PDP in talks gathers hundreds of public support statements, your PDP is already the most popular one ever. Having seen the amount of "please speak up for this" vs the actual outcome, I would say that eleven support statements is already a lot. > or even more, I could register tons of emails and speak up in favor of my own proposal, and of course, there is nothing in the PDP that disallows that (if anyone is able to demonstrate that is my own voice cloned). That would be malicious; and potentially illegal in some jurisdictions. Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Last Call for Comments (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]