This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stefan Paletta
stefanp-l-address-policy-wg at cabal1.net
Mon Sep 25 14:59:29 CEST 2017
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 09:24:55AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > "I am planning to open my own internet company in 4 years; can you > please save some address space for me, 'til I finish high school?" How little space is effectively equal to no (non-aggregate) space at all? For some businesses, a /22 will be as useless as a /24. Who knowns what kinds of new businesses will be most affected by this in four years? IPv4 allocation having left behind the “as needed” phase really makes it impossible to bet on RIR-provided IPv4 space for anything other than transition mechanisms. –Stefan
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]