[address-policy-wg] 2017-03, New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)

> In both scenarios relying on only IPv4 is insanity,

it's a business decision, and probably has many factors behind it.  you
and i might think it unwise, but 'insanity' is a bit in the weeds.

> They are beyond help

not at all.  the vendors are more than happy to sell them CGNs, and
other NATs of many flavors.  i just don't like the result.

but, as i said, we have demonstrated time and again that we can not
seriously affect the tragically slow deployment of ipv6.  so i do not
make decisions based on changing that.

>> P.S : This time I use my v6 smtp server even though at home I cannot
>> still use a v6 prefix ;)

same here, darn it.  welcome to NTT B-Flets land.

randy