[address-policy-wg] 2017-03, New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)

Hi,

Le 22/09/2017 à 08:47, address-policy-wg-request at ripe.net a écrit :
> [...]
> I'm working around IPv6 since 2001. Anna and Randy probably since before 
> that. We have deployed IPv6. It didn't enable us to completely get rid of 
> IPv4 within our networks. That also didn't solve any issue for 3rd party 
> networks -- they all still need IPv4 addresses.

being a newbie here can you please explain briefly why, as of today ,
these people really need IPv4 addresses ? Or at least why they cannot
start a transition process towards IPv6?


Regards,

-- 
Willy Manga
@ongolaboy
https://ongola.blogspot.com/



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20170923/1fe5960c/attachment.sig>