[address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)

Hi Peter, All,


On Fri, 22 Sep 2017, Peter Koch wrote:

> Anna, all,
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 01:56:13PM +0100, Anna Wilson wrote:
>
>> It's not an unreasonable effect to hope for. But the current /8 policy is already quite restrictive. I would be surprised if full runout would have a much greater effect on existing IPv4 holders. And even if that effect is something above negligible, the burden of it falls disproportionately on post-runout new entrants.
>
> do we know how many LIRs eligible under the current policy have not
> yet asked for a final /22?
>
> -Peter


Thanks for that question!


Looking at the alloclist from today, and filtering for RegIDs, i can 
count: 16354
(hmmm... # on https://labs.ripe.net/statistics is 16825, seems i'm mising 
something...)

But anyway... the number of IPv4 /22s is 15391. From that number:
195 in Sept/2012 after the runout date.
595 in Q4/2012 (runout was in september)
1854 in 2013
2441 in 2014
3178 in 2015
3258 in 2016
2429 in 2017, so far.

So, 13950 /22s between Q4/2012 and today, hence i would say your answer is 
around 2404 LIRs (16354-13950).


ps: Someone at the NCC might have looked deeply into this, or not. :-)


Regards,
Carlos Friaças