This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Farmer
farmer at umn.edu
Fri Sep 22 18:24:26 CEST 2017
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 5:04 AM, Tim Chown <tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > ... and ARIN are on a last /10 policy which sees applicants get a /28 to a > /24, so presumably those /28’s are routed at some level; that’s been in > place for some time, how is it working out? ... > This ARIN policy is in section 4.10 of ARIN's NRPM; https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four10 This policy specifically envision the day when smaller than /24 blocks become routable and/or there could be non-routed needs for globally unique IPv4 addresses, in either of those cases it would be wasteful to assign a whole /24. Currently if a routable block is needed, which is typically the case, ARIN's operational practice is to assign a /24. However, if or when, smaller blocks become generally routable, no policy change is necessary for ARIN Staff to change it's operational practice. Further, it should be noted that to access that pool of IPv4 resources, a justification as to how the IPv4 addresses will be used to support the immediate deployment of IPv6 is necessary. Use of that pool to simply deploy more IPv4 addresses does not conform to the intent of this policy. Further, if an organization, already has access to IPv4 resources of any kind, there is a strong presumption they don't need to access this pool. Thanks -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer at umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 =============================================== -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20170922/0d651c69/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]