[address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)

I agree with Mikael.

It all goes again and again.

I don’t see a need to change the current policy. Especially not to reduce the assignment.

There has to come a time for the IP4 to finish at RIR level before pressure builds up on Ip6 rollout for those who didn’t bother to date. I don’t believe prolonging this even further serves the interest the community better, it does however serves the interest of brokers and rouge LIRs selling ‘Virgin, never used blocks’ on the market today by increasing their profits.

I’m against this proposal.

With Kind Regards,
Dominik Nowacki

Clouvider Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 08750969<tel:08750969>. Registered office: 88 Wood Street, London, United Kingdom, EC2V 7RS. Please note that Clouvider Limited may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security and staff training. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the intended recipient. If you do not believe you are the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify abuse at clouvider.net<mailto:abuse at clouvider.net> of this e-mail immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Clouvider Limited nor any of its employees therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.

On 22 Sep 2017, at 08:53, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se<mailto:swmike at swm.pp.se>> wrote:

On Fri, 22 Sep 2017, Randy Bush wrote:

people will say all sorts of stupid things; funny monkeys we are.  this does not mean we should use technology to teach morality lessons.  it has not worked out too well when tried.

My point is that it's useless to prolong the agony. The more we do, the longer people will procrastinate, and the more painful it becomes. /22 is a good tradeoff between the different goals here. It was a good tradeoff when it was implemented, I see it still being a good tradeoff 3 years from now.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se<mailto:swmike at swm.pp.se>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20170922/d51d2018/attachment.html>