[address-policy-wg] IXP peering lan reachability

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:41:49AM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> As regards using this as a metric for determining whether an ixp address
> assignment is being used for legitimate purposes, I'd suggest that this
> is of only marginal use at best.  By all means run a port scan to see if
> there is any obvious mis-use (e.g. services listening on www/smtp/etc),
> but the presence or absence of the route in the dfz doesn't mean
> anything one way or another.

The *absence* of the route is a very strong indicator that no other
services than directly peering-related are sitting on that network, no?

Gert
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20171024/8d6d61a3/attachment.sig>