This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Servereasy
info at servereasy.it
Fri Oct 6 23:46:27 CEST 2017
That is the problem: _for free_. A new LIR who owns a single /22 (current value: €10k) pays as much as a LIR who owns a /12 (€10M for something that they paid about 0€). There are too many interest behind IPv4 deficiency. This is totally unfair. Simple as that. Il 06/10/2017 22:01, Aleksey Bulgakov ha scritto: > Hi, all! > > I agree with Yury and oppose this proposal. It would be better to > return unused allocations more than 24 months not from the last /8 > pool. Many companies have /16, maybe more *f**or free.* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20171006/55cdb4aa/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]