[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase Extended (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)

On 27 November 2017 at 12:26, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net> wrote:

>
> Policy proposal 2016-04, "IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification" is now in the
> extended Review Phase.
>
> At the end of the Review Phase, the WG Chairs will determine whether the
> WG has reached rough consensus.
>
> <https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum>


Hi,

I support the policy goals and the amendments to the current policy

The only open question I see is if the examples included in the wording are
broad enough in terms of scope to enable a clear decision as to whether a
"usage" is (or is not) a sub-assignment? For me it's clear but I'm a native
bad english speaker and would appreciate confirmation from non-native
speakers just to make sure

Thx

J
<https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20171127/342211cb/attachment.html>