[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 05:48:42PM +0100, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote:
> [...]
> > I feel that the current version is solving partially Max case, but even in his case, if he decides to provide /64 for each hot-spot customer, this proposal will not work.
> 
> Actually the NCC IA interpretation is rather clear on this one - as
> Marco (IIRC) confirmed while the WG session. /64 assignments to hosts
> aren't a problem with the current policy text / interpretation.

Precision of language: "... with the proposed new policy text".

(Sorry to be nit-picking here)

gert
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20171108/7dc9f912/attachment.sig>