[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)

I don’t think reaching consensus in the PI/PA change will be so easy in the “near future” (considering that it may require a long implementation time), and a middle way proposal looks feasible to me.

Regards,
Jordi
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net> en nombre de Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org>
Responder a: <nick at foobar.org>
Fecha: miércoles, 8 de noviembre de 2017, 13:10
Para: <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
CC: <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
Asunto: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)

    JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
    > Fully agree, and I’ve been working around that idea for about a year
    > already … I’ve something in the kitchen, but still not mature
    > enought.
    > 
    > I’m waiting for NCC budget figures to be able to make a proposal that
    > is sustainable in the long term. I know “money” is not related to
    > policies, but in this case, even if is only rational behind the
    > proposal text, I think it is a must.
    > 
    > Nevertheless, my opinion is that that change may take, as you said, a
    > longer period of discussion, and I will like to make sure, meanwhile,
    > cases such as Max one, aren’t “in hold” for deploying IPv6.
    
    if you're planning to change this universally some time in the future,
    it would be simpler and easier to make a step change (i.e. Max's
    suggestions) in the ipv6 assignment policy now rather than making a
    fundamental change there first and catching up with other bits of policy
    later on.
    
    Nick
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.