[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)

Hi,

Excuse the briefness of this mail, it was sent from a mobile device.

> On Nov 8, 2017, at 02:41, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:20:34AM +0100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>> Ok, here is it then. Hopefully we have a lot of fun and good noise ;-) (that's music?)
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> So, basically, we have two possible approaches here:
> 
> proposed by Max (active proposal): 
>  keep the IPv6 PI policy as somewhat restrictive, trying to find wording 
>  that permits "some generally accepted" use-cases where other people's 
>  devices can get numbers from someone's IPv6 PI block
> 

I agree with Jordi. This is just a patch. This community can do better. 

> or, 
> 
> proposed by Jordi (new direction):
>  completely remove the restrictions on "letting other people use parts 
>  of someone's IPv6 PI block"
> 

much better, I would support

elvis

> 
> both would work to solve the (real) problem at hand, and Jordi's approach
> would certainly much easier than trying to come up with unambiguous wording
> to "permit some, disallow other" use cases.
> 
> Thanks for your proposal, and now let's see what the community wants :-)
> 
> Gert Doering
>        -- APWG chair
> -- 
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
> 
> SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279