This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Wed Nov 8 10:47:09 CET 2017
Responding to Sander and Gert, in a single email … Actually, I fully agree with you, and this is what I’ve said to my co-author in Dubai, during the meeting, that it will be better to just draft this together with Max, but we wanted to clarify first among ourselves. So, in the morning of 25th I’ve prepared a draft version and my co-author hasn’t provided any input back. I just resent it to him and my next step is to send a copy to the co-chairs and Max in private in a few seconds, so we can move on from there. Regards, Jordi -----Mensaje original----- De: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net> en nombre de Gert Doering <gert at space.net> Responder a: <gert at space.net> Fecha: miércoles, 8 de noviembre de 2017, 10:41 Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es> CC: <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> Asunto: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification) Hi, On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:33:36AM +0100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > I think Jan comments (in the meeting, hopefully he can repeat here) are very relevant, and I???ve a draft policy proposal in that direction, I???m waiting for my co-author review to submit it. Multiple parallel proposals touching the same area of the same policy document are never a good idea. So if you want to work on the IPv6 PI policy, please join forces with Max (or wait for his proposal to finish, either way). Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.consulintel.es The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]