[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)

Dear Working Group,

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 03:08:07PM +0200, Marco Schmidt wrote:
> Policy proposal 2016-04, "IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification" is now in the Review Phase.

I'm a bit disappointed by the reactions of the WG on this - one voice
of support on the list, silence otherwise.

Then, quite vocal opposition at the RIPE meeting in dubai (to the current
version, v2.0, while still in favour of the general idea to loosen up the
IPv6 PI policy somewhat).

Afterwards, silence again.

But if it's not on the list, it did not happen, as per the ever-repeated
explanation at the meetings.  So, does this mean "the WG supports the
current form of this proposal", and "the outburst at the RIPE meeting
was not meant as sustained opposition"?

So:

> We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft document and send any comments to <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 17 November 2017.

Please speak up *here* if you have opinions on this proposal.

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20171108/2c59379c/attachment.sig>