[address-policy-wg] [Ext] Re: 2017-01 New Policy Proposal (Publish statistics on Intra-RIR Legacy updates)

Hi Gert,

Gert Doering wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 04:20:31PM +0000, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> > If there is no gap in the policies and what you are proposing is service, 
> > why
> > was this introduced to the Address Policy WG? The charter for the RIPE NCC
> > Services Working Group makes it clear that it is the home for discussions
> > about the introduction of new services and tools
> > (https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/services).
>
> The AP and NCC Services WG chairs debated this, and it's "sitting on
> the fence" - legacy stuff / NCC services obviously go to the NCC Services
> WG, but since it was felt that APWG "owns" the transfer policy document,
> which is potentially subject to change here, the proposal ended here.
>
> We've sent a heads up to the NCC Service WG so they are informed.

Thanks for the explanation!

Regards,

Leo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4988 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20170501/432afc48/attachment.p7s>