This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Fri Mar 24 11:43:51 CET 2017
> On 24 Mar 2017, at 10:29, Dickinson, Ian <Ian.Dickinson at sky.uk> wrote: > > Requiring an ASN to be visible on the public Internet is a non-starter IMHO. +1. There is no comparable requirement in any of the RIRs which demand LIRs make their IP address allocations visible on the Internet. I fail to understand why this obligation should apply to ASNs. It’s not as if we’ll be running out of AS numbers any time soon. What are the actual (or perceived?) problems that would be solved by reclaiming the ASNs that are not seen in the Internet’s routing tables?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]