This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2016-05 I agree
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-05 I agree
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase: Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Newton, Mathew C1 (ISS Des-Arch33-Arch)
Mathew.Newton643 at mod.gov.uk
Wed Feb 15 17:11:33 CET 2017
Dear WG, Apologies for my belated follow-up; I agree with Sascha's position below so that's a +1 from me. Regards, Mathew > -----Original Message----- > From: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On > Behalf Of LIR (VM II 9) > Sent: 06 February 2017 14:24 > To: 'address-policy-wg at ripe.net' <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> > Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2016-05 I agree > > Hello all, > > I am in favour of the proposal 2016-05. In my opinion it makes sense to align > and harmonize the policies for initial and subsequent IPv6 allocations and I > believe that this policy proposal will achieve such a harmonization. > > All the best > Sascha Knabe > > Bundesverwaltungsamt > Local Internet Registry de.government
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-05 I agree
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase: Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]