This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2017-01 New Policy Proposal (Publish statistics on Intra-RIR Legacy updates)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-01 New Policy Proposal (Publish statistics on Intra-RIR Legacy updates)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-01 New Policy Proposal (Publish statistics on Intra-RIR Legacy updates)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Wed Apr 26 07:17:35 CEST 2017
On 26/04/2017 02:46, Randy Bush wrote: >> A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2017-01, "Publish statistics on Intra-RIR >> Legacy updates" is now available for discussion. >> >> The goal of this proposal is to require the RIPE NCC to publish all >> changes to the holdership of legacy resources in the existing transfer >> statistics. > that is not a goal, but rather the means. but a means to what end? > i.e. what is the goal of this proposal; what problem does it intend > to solve, or what wonderful opportunity does it hope to exploit? > > the written proposal says > > In addition to introducing greater transparency, this policy change > would also protect legacy holders from potential hijacks. > > why is this true only for legacy space? Further to this point: can RIPE NCC provide statistics for the past 3 years of the number of IP resource hijacks that have taken place? Thanks, Hank > > randy > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-01 New Policy Proposal (Publish statistics on Intra-RIR Legacy updates)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-01 New Policy Proposal (Publish statistics on Intra-RIR Legacy updates)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]