[address-policy-wg] 2017-01 New Policy Proposal (Publish statistics on Intra-RIR Legacy updates)

Greetings,

While the proposal's title seems to be a positive approach, as i read it, 
its main goal is to add extra requirements for LRH by changing «RIPE NCC 
Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders».

I think protection (or just better alarms in place!) for Legacy address 
space is a good thing, however, i'm not sure an extra workload for the NCC 
and the LRH in the case they want to transfer their asset(s) is the way to 
go.

I also agree with Sascha Luck's previous comment about LRH having to 
submit to an extra verification process.

In its current terms, i also object to this proposal.

Best Regards,
Carlos Friaças



On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Marco Schmidt wrote:

> Dear colleagues,
>
> A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2017-01, "Publish statistics on Intra-RIR Legacy updates" is now available for discussion.
>
> The goal of this proposal is to require the RIPE NCC to publish all changes to the holdership of legacy resources in the existing transfer statistics.
>
> You can find the full proposal at:
> https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2017-01
>
> As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four week Discussion Phase is to discuss the proposal and provide feedback to the proposer.
>
> At the end of the Discussion Phase, the proposer, with the agreement of the WG Chairs, will decide how to proceed with the proposal.
>
> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 24 May 2017.
>
> Regards,
>
> Marco Schmidt
> Policy Development Officer
> RIPE NCC
>
> Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum
>