[address-policy-wg] ALLOCATED PI / UNSPECIFIED next action

Am 20.10.2016 um 15:39 schrieb Ciprian Nica:
>
> In the past there have been PAs used as PIs so technically I think the
> "allocated" part should be the one that's more important, therefore I would
> support the replacement of allocated pi & unspecified to allocated pa. If
> you ignore the greed then changing the status would not make any difference. 
>
> Ripe has a relation with the LIR and the LIR with the customer. Changing PI
> to PA will not affect the workability of the IPs nor the relations that are
> already in place. Changing them to regular pi assignments would break the
> link between lir and customer and give the enduser a possibility to make
> money, nothing more.
I strongly oppose against this.
We are not living in a world where you can seize or just steal other people's
ressources just to make your live easier.

IP PI *is* a company ressource and quite often there are no relations, as well
as with other legacy IPv4.
Period.

Oliver

-- 
Oliver Bartels, M.Sc. (TUM) + oliver at bartels.de + Fon : +49-(0)89-856305-0
Oliver Bartels F+E + 80935 München, Germany + www.bartels.de + DE129558421