[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)

Anno domini 2016 David Croft scripsit:

> On 21 October 2016 at 12:55, Maximilian Wilhelm <max at rfc2324.org> wrote:
> > Anno domini 2016 David Croft scripsit:
> >> I note that the "New policy text" does not specify the replacement
> >> text for the "Contractual Requirements"
> >
> > That doesn't seem neccessary as the point in question - the definiton
> > of a sub-assignment - is specified in the new version of ripe-655.
> >
> > What are you missing?
> 
> It appears in the "Current policy text" section, which implied that it
> was going to be changed in the "New policy text" section, but I guess
> it's just there for context then.

Yes, indeed. I quoted that part as it is relavant context for the
change and holds the point in questions.

Best
Max
-- 
"Wer nicht mehr liebt und nicht mehr irrt, der lasse sich begraben."
 -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe