[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)

+1 from me on this

I think that at ripe72 someone gave an example with a situation where this
would be a problem and the policy would solve it.

That's what we need. Clearly identify a real problem and propose a policy
to fix it. Great job !

Ciprian

On Friday, October 21, 2016, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net> wrote:

> Dear colleagues,
>
> A new RIPE Policy proposal 2016-04, "IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification"
> is now available for discussion.
>
> The goal of this proposal is to define sub-assignments in IPv6 PI
> assignments as subnets of /64 and shorter.
>
> You can find the full proposal at:
>
>     https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-04
>
> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
> <address-policy-wg at ripe.net <javascript:;>> before 21 November 2016.
>
> Regards,
>
> Marco Schmidt
> Policy Development Officer
> RIPE NCC
>
> Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20161021/42c65fab/attachment.html>