[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)

Strong support in principle. We have been denied IPv6 temporary
assignments due to the NCC's interpretation that a single DHCP lease
on wifi is a "subassignment" to another entity, which was clearly not
the intention.

I note that the "New policy text" does not specify the replacement
text for the "Contractual Requirements"

Regards,
David

On 21 October 2016 at 10:15, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net> wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> A new RIPE Policy proposal 2016-04, "IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification"
> is now available for discussion.
>
> The goal of this proposal is to define sub-assignments in IPv6 PI assignments as subnets of /64 and shorter.
>
> You can find the full proposal at:
>
>     https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-04
>
> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
> <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 21 November 2016.
>
> Regards,
>
> Marco Schmidt
> Policy Development Officer
> RIPE NCC
>
> Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum
>
>



-- 
David Croft

For support enquiries please always contact support at sargasso.net
and not any named individual. UK: 0845 034 5020 USA: 212-400-1694

Sargasso Networks Ltd. Registered in England and Wales No. 06404839.
Registered Office: 46a Albert Road North, Reigate, Surrey, RH2 9EL

http://www.sargasso.net/