[address-policy-wg] transfers and renting of Integers in general (was: 2016-03)

Hi

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:08:55PM +0330, Saeed Khademi wrote:
> >> today, they are not given to us; we pay to rent them.  yes, we are
> renting integers.
> 
> That is because of a wrong policy which allows trading them.
> If there is a wrong doing, and it is being practiced by many,
> it doesn't mean it is correct.
> 
> When some organizations are selling their IP addresses, it means that
> they don't need these addresses for their internal use. Which means
> the reasons they introduced to NCC to justify their need, either do not 
> exist any more
> or were fake in the first place.
> Whatever the reason, those blocks have to be returned to NCC pool.

While I understand your frustration, please change the Subject: line 
when the discussion strays from the proposal being discussed.

One day, it might be necessary to fundamentally revisit the policies 
regarding address transfer in general, but 2016-03 is not the proposal 
doing this.

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20161020/45721d45/attachment.sig>