[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote:
>> On 19 Oct 2016, at 13:18, Sebastian Wiesinger <sebastian at karotte.org> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:
...
>>> So, yes, I consider myself still suitable as a WG chair for the address
>>> policy WG.
>>
>> Support. And thank you for doing a job that grows more and more
>> thankless by the day.
>
> +100. I’m stunned beyond disbelief that Gert’s (or Sander’s) credentials could even questioned.

Guess it's a last resort when they see that they are running out of
arguments? And amazing that
some people have turned to "personal" attacks here rather than
discussing the policy at hand.


Either way - well handled Gert, you got my full support.



Regarding the policy at hand, even considering Nick Hillard's argument
it's hard to not support
this policy. It at least try to solve a almost impossible problem to
solve, better to do some
than nothing? So a clear support from me.



And our MAIN problem is the few players that really really hard try to
game the system, they
should be banned somehow but that's hard.

I guess we need the board of RIPE NCC to once in a while step up and
block things when
they see clear abuse.



-- 

Roger Jorgensen           | ROJO9-RIPE
rogerj at gmail.com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no   | roger at jorgensen.no