[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

I believe it is an permenent solution to an temporary problem.

Think 5 years from now, after last /8 ran out, will we still care about it
anymore?

Don't fix something that will no longer exsit in a short time period.



On 19 October 2016 at 11:26, Aleksey Bulgakov <aleksbulgakov at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Ok. If it is better to say I agree that 2015-01 with 24 month period
> restriction is enough.
>
> Also there is the next text about ALLOCATED FINAL: Assignments and
> sub-allocations cannot be kept when moving to another provider. This
> allocation is not transferable to another LIR.
> What does it mean? Transfers are inpossible, but when the allocations
> move to another provider this case and should be returned to the NCC?
>
> 2016-10-19 12:21 GMT+03:00 Daniel Baeza <d.baeza at tvt-datos.es>:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > -1 to this.
> >
> > I think the current policy that prevents tranfers for 24 months is
> enough.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > El 19/10/2016 a las 10:05, Marco Schmidt escribió:
> >>
> >> Dear colleagues,
> >>
> >> The draft documents for version 3.0 of the policy proposal 2016-03,
> >> "Locking Down the Final /8 Policy" have now been published, along with
> an
> >> impact analysis conducted by the RIPE NCC.
> >>
> >> The goal of this proposal is to ban transfers of allocations made under
> >> the final /8 policy. Also the proposal specifies what resources must be
> >> added to the RIPE NCC IPv4 available pool.
> >>
> >> Some of the differences from version 2.0 include:
> >>
> >> -    Clarification that changes to holdership of address space as a
> result
> >> of company mergers or acquisitions are not affected by proposed transfer
> >> restriction
> >> -    Legacy space handed over to the RIPE NCC will be added to the IPv4
> >> available pool
> >>
> >> You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at:
> >> https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-03
> >>
> >> And the draft documents at:
> >> https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-03/draft
> >>
> >> We want to draw your attention to two changes, which we hope it will
> make
> >> your proposal evaluation easier.
> >>
> >> -    Policy proposals now contain a diff tool that allows easy
> comparison
> >> of different proposal versions – simply click on the “View Changes”
> symbol
> >> right beside the list of proposal versions.
> >> -    The RIPE NCC impact analysis only mentions areas where  the
> proposal
> >> is actually expected to have an impact. For example, if the analysis
> makes
> >> no comment about financial or legal impact, it means that no such
> impact is
> >> expected.
> >>
> >> We encourage you to read the draft document and send any comments to
> >> <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 17 November 2016.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Marco Schmidt
> >> Policy Development Officer
> >> RIPE NCC
> >>
> >> Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ----------
> Best regards,
> Aleksey Bulgakov
> Tel.: +7 (985)635-54-44
>
>


-- 
--
Kind regards.
Lu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20161019/df5f2be6/attachment.html>