[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

Hi,

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:33:54AM +0300, Aleksey Bulgakov wrote:
> It is obviously the 99??? of members want to withdraw this proposal in any
> versions, but the NCC strongly moves it forward. May be the NCC has own
> reasons to do it, but why it doesn't notice evident things.

It would be so kind of you to actually *READ* the summary I wrote at
the end of the discussion phase.  Or try to understand how the PDP works.

The NCC is not involved in the decision making whether or not a proposal
moves forward - the decision a the end of the discussion phase (which is
what is relevant here) is made by the proposer(!), in agreement with the
WG chairs (Sander and me).

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20161019/9b6a5a87/attachment.sig>