This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] APWG agenda for Madrid - second draft
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] APWG agenda for Madrid - second draft
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Supporting IPv6 Deployment Through Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Oct 17 08:57:16 CEST 2016
Hi, On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:33:52AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > F. Discussion of open policy proposals 50 min > (more specifically: presentation on the status of the open policy > proposals and Q&A, discussion will take place on the list) > > 2015-04 RIPE Resource Transfer Policies > Erik Bais > > 2016-03 Locking Down the Final /8 Policy > Remco van Mook > > 2016-04 (to be announced) Some "heads up" on this one. We used to take our time to discuss these proposals in depth, and I still think that this is a valuable use of our time. Nevertheless, we've seriously overrun the meeting slots last time, something which is hard to avoid if there are a number of "open discussion" blocks on the list (and I do not want to cut off a productive discussion right in the middle). So, what we'll do this time for "item F" is: - presentation - Q&A - which is really "I do not understand that aspect, please explain?" and not "I do not like this, can you please change ...?" - "show of hands" quick feedback about the direction the proposal should take ("move forward" vs. "opposition") detailed discussion and consensus finding takes place on the list. The *other* items marked with "discussion" need the discussion time at the meeting, because these are not proposals *yet*, and we need more direct input to decide whether to move to a specific proposal, or abandon the idea(s). Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20161017/5c1e15dd/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] APWG agenda for Madrid - second draft
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Supporting IPv6 Deployment Through Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]