This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Mon May 30 17:57:20 CEST 2016
Hi Sasha, > RIPE policy has, until recently, explicitly recognised that M&A (and > what happens to resources due to those) is not in scope for the > PDP. It is only since "last /8" that certain elements of the > "community" have tried, by hook or by crook, to arrogate > themselves the right to decide what happens to resources in the > event of M&A. It has always been in scope, it just hasn't been very interesting to write policy about. Until now when people are using it as a way to circumvent policy. Cheers, Sander -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 455 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160530/b585c81a/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]