This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Mon May 30 17:44:05 CEST 2016
Hi Sasha, > The fact remains that policy has no business regulating into the > business transactions of members (vulgo M&A) and I oppose it for > that reason alone. RIPE policy does regulate IP allocations and under what conditions you are allowed to have/transfer/etc them. I agree that RIPE policy cannot regulate an organisation's M&A itself, but what happens to IP allocations when M&A happens definitely is in scope. Not expressing any opinion in favour or against, just clarifying scope :) Cheers, Sander -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 455 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160530/23940369/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]