This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 June 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 June 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 June 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Riccardo Gori
rgori at wirem.net
Tue May 24 06:06:07 CEST 2016
Hi Roger, Il 23/05/2016 14:58, Roger Jørgensen ha scritto: > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Riccardo Gori <rgori at wirem.net > <mailto:rgori at wirem.net>> wrote: > > Hi Roger, > > > Il 23/05/2016 14:38, Roger Jørgensen ha scritto: >> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Riccardo Gori <rgori at wirem.net >> <mailto:rgori at wirem.net>> wrote: >> >> Hi Roger, >> >> thank you for your questions. I try to answer below >> >> >> Il 21/05/2016 09:45, Roger Jørgensen ha scritto: >>> <snip> >> >> So I ask _again_, where is the IPv4 need? What type of usage is >> it ment for? We've passed the "it's nice to have" some years ago, >> now we're down to , do you _really_ need 10 addresses? Can you >> survive with 2 and deploy IPv6? > I think I answered, It's not nice to have, It's business demand > and LIRs should be able to offer... with a /22 I can serve just up > to 2 or 3 of my tipical business customers. > This is lack of competitiveness. > > > sorry if I sound hard/insulting, to me it sounds like you have an > outdated business model that are doomed to go down soon, you can't > grow this way. > Change to IPv6 where you actual can have some growth and option for > the future. > > > What you are illustrating is that somehow, despite all the effort from > many parties the world do not seems to understand that there are no > more IPv4, the growth has to come from IPv6. if you look at the policy proposal we are just addressing the same point. You'll get some more if your are aware that IPv6 is the solutions and you demonstrate you are doing something. > > > > -- > > Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE > rogerj at gmail.com <mailto:rogerj at gmail.com> | - IPv6 is The Key! > http://www.jorgensen.no | roger at jorgensen.no <mailto:roger at jorgensen.no> regards Riccardo -- Ing. Riccardo Gori e-mail: rgori at wirem.net Mobile: +39 339 8925947 Mobile: +34 602 009 437 Profile: https://it.linkedin.com/in/riccardo-gori-74201943 WIREM Fiber Revolution Net-IT s.r.l. Via Cesare Montanari, 2 47521 Cesena (FC) Tel +39 0547 1955485 Fax +39 0547 1950285 -------------------------------------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by re- plying to info at wirem.net Thank you WIREM - Net-IT s.r.l.Via Cesare Montanari, 2 - 47521 Cesena (FC) -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160524/d7efad9b/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logoWirem_4cm_conR.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 41774 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160524/d7efad9b/attachment.jpg>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 June 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 June 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]