[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 June 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)

Hi Ricardo,

> If your read again 2015-05 you can easily find out that is not so silly.
> Currently the only reasonable objection about 2015-05 is that may  (I underline may) speed up the allocation rate.
> Please note that this ojection is based on the insinuation [...]

Ok, this is enough. This is not an insinuation. There have been plenty of numbers that show the effects that 2015-05 will have. They have been discussed, and there is clearly no consensus.

Let's stop this right here. It is clear that 2015-05 doesn't have consensus and never will get consensus. I am sorry, you have done your best to get this policy proposal through the process, but you didn't succeed.

We are going to discuss which direction to move in on Thursday at the RIPE meeting. We will report to this list based on that.

But don't start saying that the objections to your policy proposal are insinuations...

Cheers,
Sander