[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

Hi,

On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 02:52:08PM +0200, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN wrote:
> Investment fund would probably be more appropriate. So is it possible to
> have a non-profit investment fund ? For me "non-profit" means not
> actively seeking profit; target being a zero end-of year result.

And this is what the NCC is doing - target being a zero result.

There is money on the bank accounts, with the goal of being enough to
sustain the NCC for somewhat over a year in case something catastrophic
happens.  If that money were to grow significantly, the NCC would have
to pay taxes, which we all do not want - which is why the surplus was
refunded last year.

(All of this is more a matter for the membership meeting, though, where
detailed financial numbers are presented)

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160522/48415561/attachment.sig>