[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

Hi,

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:29:21PM +0300, Aleksey Bulgakov wrote:
> Didn't you think to review other /8 or what allocations were made before
> 2012?

How's that going to bury IPv4 and "develop the path to go to the Internet
to IPv6"?

Folks, the only way to move towards IPv6 is to *do* it.  Stop waiting
for everyone else to move for you, or move first (I've done that - moved
first, that is - 17 years ago!).  Deploy IPv6, and if someone runs 
a service important to your customers that has no IPv6, have your
customers tell them that this someone needs to get work done.

And if your suppliers do not have IPv6, go and find other suppliers that
do have (instead of finding excuses why you still buy IPv4-only products).

It will be lots of work, and lots of argueing, and sometimes it will be
more expensive.  But the wall is coming, and no matter how hard you argue
IPv4 policy will make it last forever.  You're already 5 years too late.

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160517/71f6a3bd/attachment.sig>