[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

Hi,

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 02:01:17PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> I'd politely like to ask the chairs to do two things:
> 
> 1. declare their opinion on whether 2015-05 reached consensus

Right now, we have no consensus to move forward.  We're currently 
discussing with the proposers what to do next - extend the discussion 
phase (to formally include the RIPE72 AP WG meeting), or withdraw.

> 2. use the bunfight which is inevitably going to happen in Copenhagen to
> allow them to exercise more restraint about what sort of proposals hit
> the mailing list in future so that we don't spend years wasting time
> squabbling about the dregs sitting at the bottom of the ipv4 allocation
> barrel.

I'm hearing you, and we think this discussion is indeed necessary (to be
held on wednesday about 09:30-10:30) to see whether there is general WG
consensus to move towards a more liberal (2015-05-ish), strict (2016-03-ish),
or "leave it as it is!" last /8 policy.  And then, decide what to do with
upcoming policy proposals.

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160517/45922147/attachment.sig>