This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
apwg at c4inet.net
Tue May 17 15:44:14 CEST 2016
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 02:05:26PM +0200, Marco Schmidt wrote: >A new RIPE Policy proposal 2016-03, "Locking Down the Final /8 Policy" >is now available for discussion. > >The goal of this proposal is to limit IPv4 from the remaining address pool >to one /22 per LIR (regardless of how it was received). >These “final /22†allocations will receive a separate status with >several restrictions: > >- These allocation are not transferrable >- LIRs may only retain one final /22 following a merger or acquisition >- Sub-allocations are not possible >- Reverse delegation authority can not delegated to another party I would like to see a statement from NCC Legal on the legality of any of these proposals with particular emphasis on EU "barrier to entry" legislation. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]