[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)

Hi Arash -

On 13.05.2016 03:01, Arash Naderpour wrote:
> That's not true, I know some LIRs qualified for /22 not requesting it
> and they are not running on auto-pilot (there are fully aware of the
> market situation) 

OK, even then: your point is?

Do you empty your bank account the second your employer has transfered
your salary?

At least I let it sit there until I need it, knowing, assuming or at
least hoping it sits there safe and sound.

So why would an LIR that has not yet requested its last /22 because it
simply doesn't need it at the moment still request it right now when it
is ensured that it can also request its last chunk from the cake at any
given time in the future?

Provided that the underlying conditions do not change, of course.

Best,

	-C.

> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 7:13 AM, David Monosov
> <davidm at futureinquestion.net <mailto:davidm at futureinquestion.net>> wrote:
> 
>     It would be completely irrational for any LIR that qualifies for
>     additional IPv4
>     space not to request it.
> 
>     Any LIRs not having done so yet despite qualifying are likely running on
>     auto-pilot in the enterprise world or are prevented from doing so by
>     organizational red tape of some sort.
> 
>     [...]