This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] agreement
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Wed May 11 23:34:11 CEST 2016
On Wed, May 11, 2016, at 14:52, Peter Hessler wrote: > The 23.128/10 block is ONLY for /24-/28 allocations. These are not A /24 every 6 months (provided that conditions keep being fulfilled). Because less than /24 is pretty much useless. > intended as general purpose IP blocks, and are ONLY allowed to be used > for the IPv6 trasition (DNS servers, NAT64 gateways, etc). Some people tell me that "last /8" in RIPE-land is supposed to serve the same purpose, even if it's not written. Plus, you *CAN* get more than 4 x /24 in ARIN-land (to date 2 x /24, but the allocation rate is really low). > People violating the ARIN rules shouldn't be used as an excuse for us to change > the rules in RIPE. > > https://www.arin.net/announcements/2014/20140130.html > > ARIN does not count them as part of the available ranges for > allocation, so we should not assume they are part of the normal pool. It's not the violation of ARIN rules, it's the fact that ARIN is *NOT* v4-exhausted. They still have available space, even if they call it otherwise. And it's used (or at least supposed) to reward people with real IPv6 deployment.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]