[address-policy-wg] R: agreement

Hi Riccardo,

 

This policy is so good in 2 main things:
- address the problem of customers make the customers giving new entrants a
little bit more space to handle their grow and customer acquisition
- incentive the use IPv6. Again this is the ONLY policy that advice LIRs to
use IPv6 actually



mainly the second one in my opinion is the important thing: if a LIR wants
take advantage of this proposal it MUST demonstrate having deployed IPv6 in
its network.

 

We could also make stronger this idea of really using IPv6 requesting 4 (or
5 now) stars of RIPEness.

 

So this may be considered such a prize to really do effort in implementing
IPv6 (and in Italy we know how we must facilitate it, with less than 0,5% of
adoption).

 

Regards,

Enrico Diacci.

 

it.tsnet

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160510/f740a550/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6354 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160510/f740a550/attachment.p7s>