[address-policy-wg] agreement

>> In the real world, even when a customer needs for example an /24, they 
>> need to become an LIR (and get the /22 from the last /8) as their old 
>> LIR cannot provide them with additional blocks. That also speed up the 
>> depletion of last /8. have you considered these when you made your
objection?
>> 

>They can also make their LIR job and make the unused space available to
others :)

Yes they can, but if they are really interested to make their LIR job. 
If the only motivation of new-comers is to get some IPv4 as their internet
service provider is not able to provide them with any, there would no do LIR
job.  (new RIPE NCC members are not necessarily from IT industry and are
forced to become LIR)

>> -allocations of a /22 every 18 months only from IPv4 Addresses 
>> Available Outside 185/8 to small LIRs (if LIR own < /20 of total 
>> allocations)
>>

>I would consider unfair that I could not get more than /20 when some
players have /19 or more.

And you consider it fair when you cannot get more than /22 when some players
have /19 or more? 
It may not be fair to everyone, but I cannot imagine a policy that can be
totally fair to all of us in the real world, we can put "unfair" label to
any policy proposal.


Arash Naderpour