This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] agreement
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Mon May 9 10:42:00 CEST 2016
Hello Ehsan, > we are agree about the Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision proposal . > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-05 thank you for expressing your support. However, at this point in the discussion we have seen enough support but not enough work solving the objections that have een raised. That is what is needed currently to work towards consensus. Without addressing those objections this policy proposal gets stuck. > RegID: ir.shnt You don't need to state your RegID in this working group. This working group is open to all interested parties, not just RIPE LIRs. Discussions are always between people, not organisations. Cheers, Sander -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 455 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160509/69f6276e/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]