This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Wed Jun 22 22:59:45 CEST 2016
> On 22 Jun 2016, at 21:49, Elvis Daniel Velea <elvis at velea.eu> wrote: > > let's also chip in the possibility to make /64 assignments while > redefining the definition. plenty that keep coming at the RIPE Meeting > with all kind of cases where they want to use IPv6 (PI) but membership > is not accesible. > > https://ripe72.ripe.net/presentations/114-RIPE72-IPv6-PI.pdf I think that is a orthogonally different problem though, and therefor are two different policy proposals. Best Regards, - kurtis - -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 204 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160622/3204ba92/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]