This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] another way to achieve the original motives of post-exhaustion policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] another way to achieve the original motives of post-exhaustion policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Jun 21 11:36:34 CEST 2016
> On 21 Jun 2016, at 10:20, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se> wrote: > > The post-exhaustion /22 comes with a fee that is equivalent to the LIR fee. If a LIR contains one post-exhaustion /22, then this fee is waived. It’s up to the NCC membership to make decisions about fees, not this WG. FWIW, I think we’re doomed to debate policy proposals on IPv4, none of which reach consensus, until the NCC’s address pool is gone. Some of those debates may well continue long after that point. :-(
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] another way to achieve the original motives of post-exhaustion policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]