[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

Trading is restricted by 2015-01. Don't you see it? Open the transfer
statistics and look it. But WG find the problem where is not a
problem.

2016-06-20 12:16 GMT+03:00 Gert Doering <gert at space.net>:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 06:56:47PM +1000, Arash Naderpour wrote:
>> > This policy is not about "return allocations", but about reducing the
>> > burn rate by reserving /22s for those who actually want to run a network
>> > with it, instead of trade away quickly for a short gain.
>>
>> When an allocation is not transferable to another member, one day they need
>> to be returned to RIPE NCC.
>
> Yes.  But that's a side effect of not allowing transfers of these /22s.
>
> Basically, the discussion *should* try to focus on this point, and not
> run around the mill with non-sensical arguments.
>
>  - do we want to restrict trading of "last /8 policy" /22s, yes or no?
>
> If we want restrictions, then this will have consequences (like, if you
> close your LIR and are not selling off the whole business, the /22 will
> be returned).
>
> If we want *no* restrictions, this will also have consequences - namely,
> some (few) people making money based on resources other folks have set
> aside to be there for the long-term good of the RIPE region, which many
> others see as immoral and abusive.
>
> But do not complain about the potential consequences, please just answer
> the question.
>
> Gert Doering
>         -- NetMaster
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279



-- 
----------
Best regards,
Aleksey Bulgakov
Tel.: +7 (926)690-87-29