[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

Hi.

I think there is 2015-01 and it is enough to prevent reselling for
undistributed 185./8 and others proposals make more problems for all -
members, RIPE stuff, member's customers. E.g. is multiple accoutns
when executive board suspend it and then asked to vote to allow it
again. The IPs aren't burn (it is not oil or gas) even some one sell
it. Simply the owner is some LIR but not the NCC. May be it will
increase the price, no more. But the NCC wants to have exclusive
rights to sell it (but RIPE is not organisation to make profit or I am
wrong? :) ) and creates new proposals.

2016-06-20 11:42 GMT+03:00 Gert Doering <gert at space.net>:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:39:30PM +1000, Arash Naderpour wrote:
>> > THERE. IS. NO. IPv4. LEFT!
>>
>> And is that the reason policy is trying to return only smallest allocations
>> and let the big allocation holders continue selling their ones?
>
> This policy is not about "return allocations", but about reducing the
> burn rate by reserving /22s for those who actually want to run a network
> with it, instead of trade away quickly for a short gain.
>
> Gert Doering
>         -- APWG chair
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279



-- 
----------
Best regards,
Aleksey Bulgakov
Tel.: +7 (926)690-87-29