This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arash Naderpour
arash.naderpour at gmail.com
Fri Jun 17 15:05:03 CEST 2016
IPv6 is not the answer for everything no matter how manytime you repeat that, it is not availble and possible to deploy everywhere. Arash On Friday, 17 June 2016, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote: > > > On 17 Jun 2016, at 12:47, Payam Poursaied <payam at rasana.net > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > Let's think for a better way to make it work for everybody and allow > more people on the earth to gain access to the Internet. > > Indeed. That better way is already here. It’s called IPv6. The effort > that’s being wasted here haggling over the dregs of v4 would be better > spent deploying IPv6. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160617/c7cee608/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]